Choose a concurrency model based on the workload and isolation requirements: threads are convenient for blocking I/O, processes isolate memory for CPU parallelism, isolated interpreters add a separate interpreter boundary, and asyncio is cooperative.
Understanding the Concept
Choose a concurrency model based on the workload and isolation requirements: threads are convenient for blocking I/O, processes isolate memory for CPU parallelism, isolated interpreters add a separate interpreter boundary, and asyncio is cooperative.
Design for error propagation and shutdown before maximizing worker counts.
How to reason about concurrent execution
Workers may start and finish in a different order on every run. Focus on ownership of data, how work and errors move between workers, and what happens when one worker stops early. Locks protect invariants, queues exchange messages, and explicit shutdown logic prevents blocked or orphaned workers.
Concurrency adds overhead and failure modes. Begin with a working sequential solution, choose bounded worker counts and explicit timeouts, then measure whether overlap or parallel execution improves the target workload.
Worked Example
Read the code from the first line to the last. Identify which values are inputs, which operation is being demonstrated and what should happen before running it.
import concurrent.futures
def square(number):
return number * number
with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=2) as executor:
print(list(executor.map(square, [2, 3, 4])))
Walkthrough: What Each Part Does
- The imports make concurrent.futures available. These are standard-library building blocks unless the example explicitly names an external tool.
- The definition square creates reusable behavior. Its body runs when called, awaited or instantiated; defining it alone does not run the body of an ordinary function.
- The with or async with scope controls lifetime. Setup takes place on entry, and cleanup runs on exit even when an exception interrupts the body.
- The last lines coordinate completion and inspect results. Actual worker scheduling may differ between executions.
This demonstration focuses on one practical behavior. Before changing several lines, vary one input or one configuration choice and check whether the result changes for the reason you expected.
Example Output
[4, 9, 16]
The output above was captured by running the example in the available Python environment. The order of concurrent events, durations and platform-dependent values can legitimately differ on your computer.
Important Behavior and Edge Cases
Choosing threads solely because there are several CPU cores, without considering the CPython build and GIL.
Design for error propagation and shutdown before maximizing worker counts.
Practice Exercise
Classify three jobs: downloading pages, compressing large files and handling many async sockets.
Write down the result you expect before running your changed code. Check at least one normal case and one boundary or failure case. If your example starts workers or opens resources, verify how they are cleaned up.
Further reading: official documentation and API reference.
Common Beginner Mistakes
- Choosing threads solely because there are several CPU cores, without considering the CPython build and GIL.
- Forgetting to handle worker errors and shutdown, even when the normal completion path appears correct.
Key Takeaways
- Choose a concurrency model based on the workload and isolation requirements: threads are convenient for blocking I/O, processes isolate memory for CPU parallelism, isolated interpreters add a separate interpreter boundary, and asyncio is cooperative.
- Design for error propagation and shutdown before maximizing worker counts.
- Practice: Classify three jobs: downloading pages, compressing large files and handling many async sockets.